Business partner management refers to the legal services provided to standardize and promote the compliance operation of business partners of customers in accordance with their compliance policies. In the context of global compliance, as an extension of business activities, business partners' violations often affect the enterprise itself. Enterprises that neglect compliance management of business partners often bear management responsibilities and business reputation losses. Therefore, larger enterprises or influential enterprises in the industrial chain often extend their compliance policies to business partner management.

With the rapid development of the short video industry, cases involving short video copyright are also increasing year by year. According to the number of cases reported in the "News Briefing on the Trial of Short Video Copyright Cases" released by the Beijing Internet Court in April 2022, the number of cases involving short video copyright has great potential for growth and significant growth. In this monthly report, we will focus on "short videos".

On June 24, 2022, the "Anti monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China" (hereinafter referred to as "Anti monopoly Law") was amended for the first time 14 years after its promulgation. This modification is not an average effort, but rather a relaxation. So who has the greatest impact on this practice? We believe that this amendment has the greatest impact on six categories of entities. In addition, we will briefly analyze the draft for comments on six supporting department regulations issued by the General Administration of Market Supervision on June 27, 2022.

At 19:55 p.m. on June 2, 2022, the China Securities Investment Fund Association (hereinafter referred to as the Association) released the Notice on Matters Related to the Registration and Filing of Private Fund Managers (ZJXZ [2022] No. 203, hereinafter referred to as the Notice on Registration and Filing) on its official WeChat official account. The Registration and Filing Work Notice has issued a total of four documents. On the one hand, it updated the "List of Application Materials for Registration of Private Fund Managers" (hereinafter referred to as the 2022 List or the 2020 List, which is divided into two categories of managers: securities and equity) issued in 2020, and on the other hand, it has newly issued the "Points of Attention for Filing of Private Investment Funds" (hereinafter referred to as the "Points of Attention for Filing", which is divided into two categories of funds: securities and equity). Given that the "Registration and Filing Work Notice" is an important regulatory policy document of the Association in recent years, major law firms have conducted many interpretations and explanations of the document No. 203. "A good meal is never too late. After participating in the training organized by the association to further master and clarify regulatory standards, we conducted a practical interpretation of the specific content of this change, combined with market operations, and provided relevant analysis opinions. We hope to be helpful to the compliance management of private fund managers.".

On June 24, 2022, the 35th meeting of the 13th Standing Committee of the National People's Congress passed the decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on revising the "Anti monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China", and the newly revised "Anti monopoly Law" will officially enter into force on August 1, 2022. The newly revised "Anti monopoly Law" is the first large-scale revision of the "Anti monopoly Law" that came into effect in 2008. From the perspective of content, the newly revised "Anti monopoly Law" is a comprehensive revision based on the experience of the past 14 years of anti monopoly law enforcement. The revised content is very rich, including not only the four pillars of the anti monopoly law, namely, concentration of operators, monopoly agreements, abuse of market dominance, and administrative monopoly, but also aspects such as anti monopoly administrative investigation and legal liability. The following is an explanation of the key issues involved in the newly revised "Anti monopoly Law".

A month ago, the wanton illegal activity of nucleic acid testing institutions has just subsided. Half a month ago, the attack at Tangshan Barbecue in Hebei Province triggered a nationwide fever, followed by the bustle of the Red Code incident in Zhengzhou, Henan Province. However, the criminal case involving the father and daughter of Yellow Code in Dandong, Liaoning Province, due to medical obstruction, has again attracted the attention of the entire population. It can be said that one wave has not been flat and another wave has been hot. When will the dots of the troubled autumn end? In the face of this situation, the author, who has always been cautious, originally wanted to let the bullets fly for a while. However, netizens are still concerned about it, so let's talk about it based on the facts.

Due to new changes in the Beijing epidemic, the original date for the opening of primary and secondary schools on June 13, 2022 has been postponed indefinitely, once again challenging the fragile nerves of parents. Because all this means that the divine beasts still have to take online classes at home! It is believed that many parents of adolescent children have encountered such problems. Children sometimes surf the Internet, chat with others, watch anime, or chase celebrities during their online classes... When you can't bear it anymore and decide to check or confiscate their child's mobile phone or iPad, the child stands up and says that you have violated their privacy rights, violated the Minors Protection Law, and even reported a warning to you. "You spoke up to him and wished you could slap him, but you were speechless.".

Recently, the malicious injury incident at Tangshan BBQ has aroused widespread concern. The brutality of the suspect's behavior makes people angry. After the incident, netizens strongly condemned the suspect and actively provided clues for the public security organs. It can be seen that everyone hopes that the suspect in this case will be punished by the law, and everyone has a good starting point. However, there are also a few people who transfer their anger to the barbecue shop owner.

In bankruptcy practice, the debtor is usually insolvent, and the creditor's debt repayment rate is generally relatively low, so the creditor cannot be fully repaid. What creditors want is an increase in the debtor's assets or, as far as possible, to include all relevant assets in the bankruptcy property to improve the repayment rate. The question is, when the bankruptcy proceedings have ended, and the shareholders of the bankrupt (i.e., the original debtor) still have unpaid capital contributions, can the creditors, through ordinary civil proceedings, require the shareholders of the bankrupt to assume supplementary liability for repayment of the bankrupt's bankruptcy debts within the scope of their unpaid capital contributions?This article reveals the answer to this question through a case of the Supreme People's Court.