Bribery is a power money transaction, and the person who provides the bribe usually constitutes the crime of bribery. However, due to the complexity and diversity of social life, bribery behavior unfolds in multiple chains. The person who provides bribery funds may not necessarily be the requester of the bribery behavior, nor may they know the true purpose of the funds. Therefore, although bribery funds are provided in specific circumstances, they may not necessarily constitute the crime of bribery.

In today's digital era, as the core of software and Internet enterprise operations, software security is increasingly concerned. Software code leakage (broadly defined as leaks, including cracking and leaking executable programs) may lead to the loss of intellectual property and the leakage of trade secrets, posing a huge threat to the company. This paper aims to delve into the issue of software code leakage and focus on how software companies can protect themselves at the legal level.

On April 24, 2024, US President Biden signed a package of bills related to aid to Ukraine and Israel, including the Division H Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversarial Controlled Applications Act (H.R.7521), which defines TikTok as "applications controlled by foreign hostile forces.".

In recent years, with the continuous growth of trademark applications and registrations in China, trademark registration has gradually become a prominent issue. In the first half of 2023 alone, the Trademark Office cracked down on 249000 malicious trademark registrations, of which 192000 were not authorized in trademark registration applications, objections, and other authorization processes, accounting for 77.1%. How to identify trademark registration, regulate trademark registration, balance the rights between different subjects, and correctly define the boundaries of rights have become hot topics of legislative and judicial attention. Coinciding with the annual "4.26 World Intellectual Property Day", courts across the country have successively released typical cases of intellectual property protection in 2023. Among them, cases of regulating trademark registration have been selected, reflecting the exploration and attempts of local courts to stop trademark registration and purify the market competition environment in response to the aforementioned hot topics and concerns.

On April 23, the Beijing Internet Court delivered a judgment on the first instance of the "first case of AI voice infringement in China" (hereinafter referred to as "AI voice case"), clearly affirming that, on the premise of identifiability, the protection scope of the rights and interests of natural persons' voices can extend to AI generated voices. The content generated by artificial intelligence often relies on certain materials for machine learning and training, which are then transformed into AI artifacts with a certain appearance. In this case, the AI sound generated using text to speech software (hereinafter referred to as the "product in question") is called a "recorded work". The five defendants in this case, including the design developer, voice material provider, seller, buyer, and user of the product in question, can be considered as the main entities involved in the generative artificial intelligence industry. It is worth pondering how to avoid infringement risks and better promote industrial development.

Firstly, from the perspective of protection system, China has basically established a legal system for the protection of new plant varieties with Chinese characteristics. A legal protection system has been formed, with Article 123 of the Civil Code as the positioning, Chapter 4 of the Seed Law as the protection foundation, and the Special Regulations on the Protection of New Plant Varieties as the protection mainline. At the same time, two detailed rules for the implementation of the regulations and three judicial interpretations of the Supreme People's Court as auxiliary axes.

Accurate determination of data identity is crucial in intellectual property cases, as it directly affects the trial and judgment results of the case. Firstly, it plays a crucial role in evidence preservation by determining data integrity or tampering, ensuring the legality of the evidence. Secondly, the determination of the identity of the data between the plaintiff and defendant helps to prove the authenticity of the infringement facts. Finally, determining data consistency can help confirm the scope of infringement and affect the determination of the consequences of infringement. It can be seen that the determination of data identity directly supports the effective implementation of the intellectual property legal system and is an important link in ensuring judicial fairness and protecting intellectual property.

Recently, the grand debut of domestic cars such as Xiaomi, NIO, and Ideal has attracted everyone's attention. Technology has changed life, and this concept is constantly moving towards new stages in the automotive industry. However, the cutting-edge technology of autonomous driving has long been subject to disputes over patents, technical secrets, and other related issues. The reasons for this are not only the high, precision, and cutting-edge characteristics of the field and the scarcity of top talents, but also the inherent conflict between personnel mobility and trade secret protection.

Industry associations and chambers of commerce are important components of social organizations in China. Their member entities are units engaged in economic activities of the same nature, industry personnel, or economic organizations in the same region. Their names are generally suffix with words such as "Industry Association", "Association", "Chamber of Commerce", "Industry Guild", "Federation", "Promotion Association", etc. In addition to possessing the basic characteristics of non-profit and non-governmental social organizations, industry associations and chambers of commerce also exhibit significant characteristics such as industry, industry, and economy.