Civil and Commercial Dispute Resolution， Marital and Family Law， Labor Law and Human Resource，
Lawyer Yao Lijun is mainly engaged in civil and commercial dispute resolution,marriage and family affairs,labor and personnel services
Lawyer Yao Lijun started working in a law firm in 2016 and began practicing as a lawyer in 2018
Lawyer Yao Lijun has represented civil and commercial litigation cases,involving multiple aspects such as company,contract,inheritance,labor dispute,tort,and execution objection,and has rich experience in representing litigation cases
From 2016 to 2019,Lawyer Yao Lijun worked as a paralegal and intern lawyer at Shanghai Haihua Yongtai(Beijing)Law Firm
Since 2019,Lawyer Yao Lijun has served as a full-time lawyer at Beijing Gaopeng Law Firm
Dispute over Liability for Misrepresentation of Securities by a Company v. a Group Company
CITIC Securities Co., Ltd. v. New Hualian Holdings Co., Ltd. Corporate Bond Trading Dispute Case
Case of Objection to Execution by Outsiders in the Case of CITIC Securities Co., Ltd. and Jiaxing Runshi Renfang Equity Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership)
Execution Case of Pledged Securities Repurchase Dispute between CITIC Securities Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Hexia Investment Co., Ltd
Execution Case of Pledged Securities Repurchase Dispute between CITIC Securities Co., Ltd. and Sun and Yuan
Execution Case of Pledged Securities Repurchase Dispute between CITIC Securities Co., Ltd. and New Hualian Holdings Co., Ltd
A dispute case concerning OTC derivatives trading between a limited liability company and a limited liability company in Shandong Province (China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission arbitration case)
How to Defend the Lawful Infringement of Private Cinema
How to Say No to Cyber Defamation?
Analysis of the Operator's Safety Guarantee Obligation in the Tangshan Incident
A Brief Comment on the First Case of False Statements in the Inter bank Bond Market in China
- Chinese
-
2024 08/22
Legal remedies for being falsely registered as a shareholder
In judicial practice, it is not uncommon for some illegal individuals or companies to falsely use the identity information of others and register them as shareholders of the company when handling company registration and change registration. The person whose identity information has been impersonated (hereinafter referred to as the "impersonated person") is not aware of their becoming a shareholder of the company, and may not realize that their identity information has been impersonated until they are sued by the company's creditors, their personal property is sealed and frozen, restricted from leaving the country, restricted from high consumption, or held accountable by relevant departments, thus facing huge legal risks.
-
2023 01/06
A Brief Comment on the First Case of False Statements in the Inter bank Bond Market in China
On December 30, 2022, the Beijing Financial Court issued a first instance judgment on the court's No. 1 case, "Blue Stone Assets and a Bank and Other Securities Misrepresentation Liability Dispute Case." This case, as the first nationwide dispute case on the liability for misrepresentation in the interbank bond market, has a landmark significance. In the judgment, whether the Securities Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the "Securities Law") is applicable to the interbank bond market and its judicial interpretation "When a misrepresentation is not subject to administrative penalties or effective criminal judgments by regulatory authorities, how the court determines it, and the consideration and review of the elements of tort liability in a misrepresentation case are groundbreaking. They further compact the responsibilities of bond underwriters and bond service institutions, emphasizing that institutional investors have a higher duty of care,", It has great reference value for the judicial practice of the future interbank bond market and even the entire bond misrepresentation case.
-
2022 06/17
Gao Peng's Focus | Analysis of Operators' Safety Guarantee Obligations in the Tangshan Incident
Recently, the malicious injury incident at Tangshan BBQ has aroused widespread concern. The brutality of the suspect's behavior makes people angry. After the incident, netizens strongly condemned the suspect and actively provided clues for the public security organs. It can be seen that everyone hopes that the suspect in this case will be punished by the law, and everyone has a good starting point. However, there are also a few people who transfer their anger to the barbecue shop owner.
-
2021 08/23
How to Defend the Lawful Infringement of Private Cinema
In recent years, private cinemas (also known as on-demand cinemas, movie cafes, and micro cinemas) have sprung up throughout the country, serving as a box office supplement to traditional cinemas and meeting the personalized viewing needs of different groups of people. In 2018, the former State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film, and Television promulgated and implemented the "Regulations on the Management of On-Demand Cinemas and On-Demand Cinema Lines", starting to standardize the management of On-Demand Cinemas and On-Demand Cinema Lines. However, due to the fact that a large number of private cinemas were established before the promulgation and implementation of the aforementioned regulations, there are very few private cinemas in the market that have registered and obtained a "Film Screening Business License" in accordance with the aforementioned regulations, and the aforementioned regulations have not been fully implemented. Due to the nonstandard development of the industry, there are increasing cases of infringement of the right to network dissemination of work information by private cinemas, and private cinemas often lose lawsuits in such cases. This article aims to analyze the reasons for the failure of private cinemas by sorting out such cases, and explore whether the legitimate source defense can be applied to such cases, as well as how to apply it if applicable.