Internet service providers assisting in uploading popular programs constitutes infringement
Hotspot · Analysis
Internet service providers assisting in uploading popular programs constitutes infringement
On April 18, 2024, the Beijing Internet Court held a press conference on the trial of online copyright disputes related to performing arts, and released nine typical cases of online copyright disputes related to performing arts. Among them, for network service providers who provide convenience for users to upload popular programs, it is deemed as aiding infringement.
Typical significance
Currently, some platforms, in order to attract users, intentionally ignore authorization issues even when they know that using variety show content requires authorization, allowing users to upload some popular programs to the platform, and even providing convenience for users to upload. This case clarifies that the network service provider provides convenience for users to upload popular programs, which constitutes a clear or necessary knowledge of the infringement of information network dissemination rights by network users, and should bear the responsibility of assisting in the infringement. This case aims to encourage network service providers to choose a healthy and orderly operating model in their operations, reduce infringement risks, and demonstrate a judicial attitude towards protecting copyright and promoting the healthy development of business formats under new communication methods.
Basic case details
The plaintiff A is the copyright owner of a popular Quyi variety show. Defendant B provided the public with online on-demand and download services for the variety show in the "Cross Talk Selection" section of the "Cross Talk Quyi" section of its development and operation platform. Plaintiff A believes that the variety show in question was uploaded to the platform operated by Company B in the form of a collection during the hot broadcast period, and the uploaded users passed the platform's "radio anchor authentication", seriously infringing on the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests, causing significant economic losses to Plaintiff A. They request the court to order Defendant B to compensate for economic losses of 90000 yuan, lawyer fees of 9990 yuan, and notarization fees of 10 yuan, totaling 100000 yuan.
Key points of the judgment
The software involved in the case displays user information, and defendant B has also submitted user registration information to the court. It can be determined that the work in question was uploaded by online users, and defendant B provided information storage space services for the work in question. The court comprehensively considered the operation mode of the network platform involved in the case and believed that for popular and highly watched variety shows, defendant B, as the operator of the audio platform, should recognize that it is difficult for individual users to obtain copyright authorization. However, he still provided convenience for users to upload a collection of popular works by setting up classification sections and other methods, which is subjectively flawed. And the username used to upload infringing works is itself the "Complete Collection of Crosstalk by XXX", and the uploaded content also belongs to a variety show related to XXX (a well-known cross-talk actor) that is currently popular and has a high level of attention. Defendant B not only failed to provide strict copyright authorization review, but also provided radio anchor authentication for users. They are at fault for the accused infringement behavior and should bear the liability for assisting in infringement.
Judgment result
The first instance judgment stipulates that defendant B shall compensate plaintiff A with an economic loss of 1500 yuan.
After the first instance judgment, defendant B filed an appeal, and the second instance judgment rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict. (Source: Beijing Internet Court)
Industry · New Observations
1. Notice on Issuing the Fire Safety Guidelines for Screenplay Entertainment Business Places (Trial)
On April 6, 2024, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the National Fire Rescue Bureau issued a notice on the issuance of the Fire Safety Guidelines for Screenplay Entertainment Business Places (Trial), and jointly formulated the Fire Safety Guidelines for Screenplay Entertainment Business Places (Trial).
The "Safety Guidelines" consist of five aspects and twenty articles, which clarify the basic fire safety conditions, fire safety management, fire and electricity safety management, flammable and explosive materials safety management, and safe evacuation management for scripted entertainment venues such as murder and escape from secret rooms. It stipulates that scripted entertainment venues shall not be set up on underground floors or below, residential buildings, or "three in one" venues; Places that primarily serve children shall not be located underground, semi underground, or on four or more floors above ground; A one key unlocking device should be installed. The Safety Guidelines also stipulate that open flames are not allowed to be used illegally in entertainment venues.
2. Work Plan for Organizing Special Actions on Advertising Supervision in the Field of People's Livelihood
On April 6, 2024, the State Administration for Market Regulation released information on its website and recently issued a work plan to organize a special campaign for advertising supervision in the field of people's livelihood nationwide from April to November 2024.
The work plan is clear, and we will maintain a high-pressure and strict crackdown on illegal behaviors in medical beauty advertisements, strictly regulate the publication of medical beauty advertisements, and crack down on illegal behaviors such as publishing medical beauty advertisements without advertising review, creating appearance anxiety, and exaggerating medical beauty effects. We will also investigate and punish platforms, live streaming rooms, and beauty anchors and influencers for publishing illegal medical beauty advertisements in live marketing; Strictly investigate and punish advertisements for "divine doctors" and "divine medicines", and severely punish advertisements for medical, drug, medical equipment, and health food that are disguised through health science popularization and other forms; Strengthen the supervision of food advertising, strictly prevent the promotion of health food efficacy and ordinary food efficacy; We will investigate and deal with false and illegal advertisements for myopia prevention and control products in accordance with the law, continuously rectify advertisements that confuse true and false myopia, and use expressions such as "rehabilitation", "recovery", "degree reduction", "myopia cure", "myopia nemesis", and "degree repair" to mislead consumers; Strengthen the supervision of advertisements for daily chemical products such as cosmetics and disinfection products, and vigorously crack down on illegal behaviors that explicitly or implicitly indicate that cosmetics and disinfection products have medical effects in advertisements.
3. Opinions of the Ministry of Justice of the China National Intellectual Property Administration on Deepening Cooperative Protection and Strengthening Legal Protection of Intellectual Property
On April 25, 2024, the Ministry of Justice of the China National Intellectual Property Administration issued the Opinions on Deepening Cooperative Protection and Strengthening Legal Protection of Intellectual Property.
Related recommendations
- Do cartoon characters belong to portraits? Viewing Jia Ling's Portrait, Winning Rights Protection and Receiving Compensation
- 2024 Paris Olympics: Global Broadcasting and Copyright Protection of Sports Events
- The Story of the Rose from a Legal Perspective: The Legal Path of Rose's Struggle for Child Custody
- 1.8 billion views are accused of lacking broadcasting qualifications, causing controversy over short videos or micro dramas